Google

Like many things we colloquially call “Marketing,” there is ambiguity in the language we use, and the terms inbound marketing and outbound marketing are not immune.  We need a common language, and when one does not exist, we need to clarify our meaning.

This is the first of many articles I envision that will try to unearth this ambiguity, and help us to ask questions of one another to ensure we are both speaking and hearing the same definition as we operate.  This disambiguation is becoming critical as older executives and managers communicate with younger team members and staff, and recent definitions in use can cause confusion, or worse, ambiguously set and subsequently missed expectations.

Inbound & Outbound

I like the disambiguation found on Wikipedia for the terms. Definition set 1. Wikipedia says “inbound marketing (implies as recent) is a marketing strategy that focuses on getting found by customers.” The article further suggests that it is synonymous with relationship marketing (attributed to Seth Godin) and permission marketing, a more common term.  The complementary term “outbound marketing is a pejorative term for traditional marketing that focuses on interrupting customers through excessive and inappropriate advertising and promotion,” and the term is synonymous with interruption marketing.

This can be summarized as: inbound marketing is the tactics, programs, and initiatives that make a company visible and findable such that customers want to come “into” and engage with the company and outbound marketing (brand, positioning and core messaging) is secondary, at best.  The visual metaphor in my mind, is not having a clear destination in mind while waiting for a train in Grand Central Station, a place with dozens of trains every hour, inbound and outbound.  Which one is looking for you?

Definition set 2. Wikipedia (calls out as “older”) says “Inbound marketing is market research.” it goes on to say that in this definition, “…information about customer needs and interests, not customer themselves, flow into the company.”  The complementary term “outbound marketing is the non-pejorative term for marketing communications, […] information that flows out to prospective customers who have a need.” In this definition, customer needs and requirements for solutions are “inbound” to the company, and it is up to Marketing to digest that information, and lead the Company to create products and services and develop those into solutions that satisfy the needs and requirements of the customer.

This pair of definitions can be summarized as inbound and out bound marketing are defined by direction of flow of information, inbound tells companies what solutions are needed by customers, and outbound is the communication of solution value in order to motivate customer interest and sales using a broad set of marketing methods based on a central positioning and messaging framework.

Analysis.  The difference based on its claimed origin (less than 10 years old), is greatest between inbound marketing definitions 1 and 2.  Outbound marketing while pejorative or non-pejorative (the new definition disparages, is derogatory or belittles “advertising and promotions”) is functionally similar in terms of customer outreach, and targeted prospective customer engagement.  Based on the Wikipedia definitions, let’s look at these side by side:

Inbound

Outbound

Widely Known Traditional Definition
  • Market research
  • Customer needs
  • Product requirements
  • Involves entire company
  • Identify best solutions
  • Marketing communications
  • Brand visibility
  • Measured advertising
  • Effective promotions
  • Builds customer relationship
Lesser Known Recent Definition
  • Getting found
  • Optimize internet traffic
  • Converts clicks, SEO
  • Delivers canned product
  • Disparaging/derogatory to marketing profession in an organization
  • Considered pejorative
  • Excessive and inappropriate
  • Unmeasured Advertising
  • Ineffective Promotion
  • Secondary or unessential
I personally don’t believe that the new more recent definition works.  It is limited, and implies that marketers are getting lazy.  Why, because it suggests that if you build a good inbound marketing program and they will come.  That’s bull.  It further suggests that marketing as a  function really has little to no function in the traditional “inbound” sense of two-way interaction with customers to ensure that the solutions provided are satisfying the customer’s true requirements.  Why doesn’t the new definition work? Traditional well-grounded positioning and value-based messaging must still follow time-tested marketing processes completed by real marketing professionals, or the find-ability and visibility messages will not work.  Worse than that, customers with social media as their sword of truth, will call out a Company on anything that doesn’t pass the truth test of least astonishment!  Like being findable as a Company,  negative customer feedback can destroy a Company by reversing the same approach.
Of course, we do need to make companies easily findable, and do it in a competitive way, that is an absolute to be effective in any marketplace.  This has been true since the first yellow pages phone book were ever published, and even before that with signs hanging outside storefronts identifying what goods and services a vendor sold to passer’s buy.  Albeit accelerated and more digital today, getting found has been on a continuum of ubiquity since the first chunk of meat was hung up in an open air market sending out a smell to entice peasants to purchase it for the nightly stew.
Getting back to the better term, relationship or permission marketing is really a new marketing method or activity that is dependent on digitally social media tools that we now have available.  Recognizing this ensures the very success of it, as it is then not a replacement for traditional inbound/outbound marketing, but a new tactic that leverages the core marketing fundamentals in a company.  Let’s not change our language in such a way that marginalizes the pervasive strategy and executio required for developing two-way (inbound and outbound) relationships with our customers.
Write a comment and tell us what you think?

One Response to Inbound & Outbound Marketing – What Are We Talking About?

  1. Noel Hurley says:

    Thanks Andrew, I 100% agree with this article, it seems like the term inbound marketing has been hijacked by web marketing companies to hype “why they are different from traditional marketing” when in reality not much has changed in terms of strategy and tactics (getting people to walk into a shop and having a nice chatty assistant to help them or visit a website and leave a comment is fundamentally the same, and yet this is being positioned as outbound marketing vs inbound marketing). My real issue is that I have now lost a word in my vocabulary in which to describe the different marketing activities to non marketing people.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.